On Wednesday Aug. 16th we attended a meeting of the Humboldt
County Mental Health Board. The featured presenter was Ed
Diksa, Training Coordinator for CIMH
(contract training
provider for California DMH). He addressed (1) the regional
recovery training this fall in Eureka and (2) a
forthcoming local MHB training he is to conduct.
We were concerned about the way the client organizing process
locally and statewide is being intruded upon by client
bureaucrats. Those are people who are likely indifferently
grounded in the local client activist milieu and collaborating
with and/or directly employed by the local mental health
system. By dint of effort/clarity this is something that may
be done with integrity, however there is no expectation of
being accountable to the local clients. Reports of flagrant
disrespect and incompetence are all too common, and there is
not much ready recourse practically speaking.
It really wont do to challenge this in a personal way and
come down individually on clients who are being divisive and
incompetent like this. The moral high ground demands that
we raise this issue as a matter of principle and that we
challenge the policy of DMH and the business of the
California Network in promoting this system of privilege
at the level of program.
Eventually Tom asked Ed to make client bureaucracy a topic
of the local MHB training. Thud! was the sound but there
was support, including from some NAMI members.
We could have made a stink about this issue and then been
publicly castigated for our pains by Mr. Diksa as being
controversial. Were sorry to say this,
but surely he
figures thats what we are about.
:-( The fact
however is that this reckless empowerment of people who are
not held responsible for the hurt they may cause let alone
the scores they may settle is a terrible toxicity. We
who are the clients deserve respect based on the merits
of our actions and this new recovery world must be
accountable to us.
|
Tom Harkins
member, Humboldt Co. MHB
Andrew Phelps
|
|