These are nice pictures, but the same rap still applies to your advocacy. At the May ApA demo ("p" is the usage standard for psychiatry rather than psychology) the Social Accountability Work Group presented a major breakthrough in "client/survivor" advocacy. And you have totally failed to note/depict that.

As usual, you continue the disgraceful MindFreedom claim that the Social Accountability Work Group is an advocacy "for money." [That group] is an advocacy against the 'medical model' as the ethical and philosophical basis for the oppression of the "client/survivors." To the shame [of MF], they refuse to challenge the 'medical model' on principle; when they say they do so, they speak "with forked tongue." They actually only challenge the present bio-bio-bio fashion whereby Big Pharma dominates psychiatric practice. That's important to challenge, as is the "torture denial" of the present system, but it's also central to our advocacy to challenge the pretense that the pre-scientific approach to behavior management is "science."